Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/13/2009 12:30:19 PM PDT by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: BGHater

Travel anywhere in the world in 15 days...man, that this is hauling you-know-what!


2 posted on 03/13/2009 12:32:13 PM PDT by DonaldC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater; tx_eggman

Something tells me that the military is planning ops in the post-satellite era. I have a bad feeling about what may soon go down up in space.


3 posted on 03/13/2009 12:34:32 PM PDT by SpinnerWebb (mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater

Won’t OBozo’s defense speding cuts nip this in the bud?


4 posted on 03/13/2009 12:36:11 PM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater

65,000 feet. Isn’t that within range of SAM’s? How long do they think it would survive?


5 posted on 03/13/2009 12:36:12 PM PDT by txnativegop (God Bless America! (NRA-Endowment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater

Won’t OBozo’s defense spending cuts nip this in the bud?


7 posted on 03/13/2009 12:36:50 PM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater

I think Popular Science Magazine features this idea about once every three years.

Maybe it will fly this time ;-)


8 posted on 03/13/2009 12:37:02 PM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater

there’s got to be plenty of ways to shoot something like this down, but of course if you’re spying on the US, chances are we won’t own any of of ‘em!


9 posted on 03/13/2009 12:37:10 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater
Original story from 2006
11 posted on 03/13/2009 12:40:33 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater

Dirigibles..Zepplins..making a comeback?

You know..I sometimes thought that particular concept of aviation got a bad rap after the Hindenberg...weren’t there a few shows on Discovery and elsewhere that put the blame on the German airship’s aluminized paint..rather than the hydrogen..for its spectacular & catastrophic failure?

With the possibility of higher fuel costs in the near future..maybe lighter than airships will be making a big comeback down the road in a few decades.....


12 posted on 03/13/2009 12:40:36 PM PDT by Dixiekraut (( Rommell...you magnificent bastard . I READ YOUR BOOK !!! ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater
“It is absolutely revolutionary,” Werner J.A. Dahm, chief scientist for the Air Force, said of the proposed unmanned airship — “

What is revolutionary is that one of these ideas is dusted off and is recycled again every 5 or so years. The blimp is always touted as the way to solve the latest problem or provide a new solution that something else cheaper can do anyway.

But not before several million is spent for the “feasibility” study w/ 1/6th scale model.

14 posted on 03/13/2009 12:41:25 PM PDT by JSteff (It was ALL about SCOTUS. Most forget about that and HAVE DOOMED us for a generation or more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater
Why am I concerned that this is principally geared for domestic surveillance? I just can't see this thing being practical in areas where the US may not have air superiority so I'm left to wonder if it will be used in the USA?
15 posted on 03/13/2009 12:41:44 PM PDT by MeganC (January 20, 2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater

Wouldn’t it be mighty easy to shoot down something this big?


16 posted on 03/13/2009 12:41:45 PM PDT by RexBeach ("Do your duty in all things." Robert E. Lee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater

sounds like the s.h.i.e.l.d. hover carrier


24 posted on 03/13/2009 12:49:28 PM PDT by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater
It's invisible... (I've seen it.)

"A spaceship?"
26 posted on 03/13/2009 12:51:56 PM PDT by evets (beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater

Sounds like the old Aerostat program.


33 posted on 03/13/2009 1:14:11 PM PDT by stuartcr (If the end doesn't justify the means...why have different means?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater
The song: "Everything Old Is New Again" applies!

Skyhook balloons were balloons developed by Otto C. Winzen and used by the United States Navy Office of Naval Research in the late 1940s and in the 1950s for atmospheric research, especially for constant-level meteorological observations at very high altitudes. Instruments like the Cherenkov detector were first used on skyhook balloons.

In the late 1940s, Project Skyhook balloons provided a stable vehicle for long duration observations at altitudes in excess of 100,000 feet. Balloons, long used for collecting meteorological data, now offered the opportunity of collecting highly specialized information and photographs.

Some people believe that the Roswell Incident was the crash of a Skyhook Balloon which was launched from a facility in Texas and circled the globe with a camera which would photograph the bad guys!

After this program the U2 and SR71 took over!

34 posted on 03/13/2009 1:15:06 PM PDT by Young Werther (Julius Caesar (Quae Cum Ita Sunt. Since these things are so.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater

eye in the sky

Uh,, for 400 million, can they make it stealth too? I wonder what kind of defense systems it will use?


41 posted on 03/13/2009 1:30:29 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater

They should use hydrogen to get it aloft. They’ll need MUCH less of it than they will helium.

And what could possibly go wrong?

;^)


45 posted on 03/13/2009 1:31:51 PM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater

They should name them the Kennedy Class blimps.


55 posted on 03/13/2009 1:49:30 PM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater

What is the saying... What was old is new again.

Right?


61 posted on 03/13/2009 2:01:07 PM PDT by racing fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson