Your post #113 to BlackVeil in "Bristol Palin breaks up with fiance Levi Johnston": You are so wrong I don't even know where to start. Your "studies" are fictions, your statement is padded with the parenthetical use of the conditional term "overall" and your flip dismissal of "people who suffer like that" is clearly based on rank ignorance. In fact, parental abuse is so horrific precisely because trauma experienced as a child from parents destroys fundamental trust. As a result, it escapes even the best efforts of the adult to reach it with almost any therapies and becomes ever more toxic over time, leading to the generational destruction of families. You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.
Your post #526 netmilsmom here: You're flat-out sick, and your understanding of a mothers' love is less than that held by animals.
your post #527 here: And it's so easy to do, too! Just get State force to rip the baby from her mother's arms and give it to some others you have decided, with your superior mind, would be better for "it."
Your post to me, #531: You're a shill. No one is as genuinely screwed up as you are presuming to be. All you want to do is inflame the debate - and let's see, whom would that benefit? Enquiring minds want to know.
Well, it appears you're quite the inflamatory, bitter person here, now doesn't it? Too bad you read everything with such a negative twist. :(
You're sputtering, thugmom. Want to bench me at recess, too?
Just because you are unable to control your anger and act appropriately in situations where anger is justified, does not mean that other lack your self-control. One of the defining aspects of maturity is the ability to accept, control and USE appropriate anger, and yes, dealing with child-abusing fathers is one of those topics.
Remaining cool and detached towards such a scenario, without acknowledging rightious anger, is not remaining "positive" and avoiding "negativity." Instead, it is precisely the cringing, cowardly, co-dependent attitude that has enabled thousands of these thugs - and thugmoms - to go on betraying and destroying their children's lives. It has also disempowered women from getting in touch with a vital energy that they could call upon to protect both themselves and their children.
This PC smearing of appropriate anger, under the guise of calling it "negativity," is mainly done by liberals and especially members of the public teaching profession. And it is insidious and even evil, and I reject it entirely. To not be "negative" when "negativity" is called for is to either be a coward, evil, or insane. So you can stuff your name-calling and passive-aggressive verbal baiting.
Not to mention that what you call "inflammatory bitterness" is merely me affirming that an abusive father should be cut off from the children he is abusing, or that a mother shouldn't be forced to give up the child she loves merely because the father didn't want to marry her.
But you're hardly unique. I've worked with abused children, and I've met many co-dependent "mothers," whose husbands could do not wrong and into who's fists these "mothers" returned their children time after time. It's utterly depraved, and so are your efforts to protect and hide these abusive cowards.
Yet you're right about one thing - "thugmoms" everywhere do in fact find me to be reliably angry, inflammatory, bitter and negative towards those who prey on children and loving mothers.
And on behalf of the children I've helped, I promise that will never change.