>>Who are you to decide that?!<<
If a mother truly loves her child, the decision to give the baby up for adoption to an intact family is the most selfless act she can do.
Unless of course we want to cheer unwed moms keeping their babies. Look at the stats. The Palin Grandchild will turn out okay, but most kids of single women don’t.
Are we really “Pro-Life” or just “Anti-Abortion”? If we are truly Pro-Life, we need to start encouraging a good life for the children of women who were wise enough not to abort.
I'm sorry, but that's just crazy. Over my cold dead body, holding a smoking gun, would you or people like you "shame" me into giving up my child, husband or no husband.
You're flat-out sick, and your understanding of a mothers' love is less than that held by animals.
You gotta be kidding me! No one has the right, for whatever reason (infertile couple, a couple wanting to adopt), to another couple’s child. Not ever.
“If a mother truly loves her child, the decision to give the baby up for adoption to an intact family is the most selfless act she can do.”
An intact family? So what if the so called “intact” couple divorces and it’s no longer an “intact” family? Do they give the baby/child back?
If both the mother and father choose to give their baby up for adoption for whatever reason, more power to them. It’s their decision. It certainly doesn’t make their decision the most selfless act.