>Clinton never stopped being President — even though, theoretically — he might have been removed from office at a particular time.
>The same thing would apply to Obama, too...
Would it? If Obama is not Constitutionally qualified, then he NEVER WAS president. Period. Also, We The People, would have EVERY right to call “Foul!”/”Fraud!” and “Conspiracy!” (Bcause, how could such a thing be kept from the public light EXCEPT by conspiracy and a GROSS, CRIMINAL negligence of those in office whose job it is to verify such.)
Don’t forget to scream cover up, every one from Dean to Pelosi has had a hand in verifying Obama’s eligibility.
If indeed a fraud was elected they had the responsibility to ensure Obama was eligible, if they knew and did nothing about it, we are looking at the potential destruction of the heads of the DNC.
You said — “Would it? If Obama is not Constitutionally qualified, then he NEVER WAS president. Period.”
Well, you’ll notice that we still have a “21st President” of the United States and he’s not been taken out of the “line-up” of Presidents, even though he was not qualified to be President, per the Constitution. That’s been documented by many people, over a period of time.
More recently, in light of the Obama qualifications issue coming up, Leo Donofrio has documented it again. He very plainly makes it clear that Chester Arthur was not qualified, per the Constitution to be President of the United States.
And furthermore, there were people who were accusing Arthur of not being qualified — at that very time he was serving (and before he became President). They just couldn’t prove it. And Arthur covered up a lot of his documentation and destroyed other stuff and made it almost impossible for anyone to find out. Yet, information has come out and it has been proven that he was not qualified to be President.
BUT, in all that, he’s still considered to have been a *President* of the United States and nothing he ever passed as a law has ever been overturned because he was “not” President.
So, we have a clear example in our nation’s history of a President not being qualified and yet, nothing changed in his Presidency as a result of not being qualified.
—
You said — “Also, We The People, would have EVERY right to call “Foul!”/”Fraud!” and “Conspiracy!” (Bcause, how could such a thing be kept from the public light EXCEPT by conspiracy and a GROSS, CRIMINAL negligence of those in office whose job it is to verify such.)”
The problem is always in the word — *if* — and there is where no one has been able to prove it. I would agree that — *if* — he were not qualified then people have every right to cry foul/fraud and conspiracy. NOW..., the problem is — you’ve got to prove the accusation of the “if”.
That’s always been the problem from the beginning. You see, it’s not an *absolute given* that this is the case. The reason why it’s an “if” — is precisely because it’s unknown and it could very well be a “wrong if” — and he can be qualified just as easily. An “accusation” doesn’t make something true. The “proof” of it, on the other hand — would make it true.
The “if factor” means that the accusation could just as easily be wrong. In fact, the longer it goes where someone cannot prove the “if” — it means it becomes less and less likely to be true (i.e., the accusation being true). That’s the problem you face now...