Ummmm..., isn’t there a bit of a problem discussing a “case” you have before the very judge who is going to hear it? LOL...
This seems quite odd. It seems less like a *lawyer* and more like a “public relations stunt”... :-)
If there was a problem, it would be with Justice Scalia, not Dr. Taitz. But Scalia didn't really discuss the details of the case with her, just procedural matters, it would seem.
On the other hand, Dr. Taitz' adversary in the case, Obama, has socialized with almost all the SCOTUS justices on at least two occasions. Is that not just as much, or even more, of a "problem"? No one knows what was discussed between Obama and his staff, on the one hand, and the justices on those occasions.