Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway

Doerr is no more correct in his assertions here than he was when the Segway was going to change how cities are designed. Algae has tremendous potential as a biofuel feedstock due to it’s extremely high oil content and non-competition with food. He’s correct in that the challenge is in the production process, however R&D has only begun into optimizing the process of producing algae on a large economical commercial scale.

His comments are as asinine as those of Thomas Watson, Chairman of IBM when he said in 1943 there was a world market for “maybe five computers”.


3 posted on 03/08/2009 3:28:42 PM PDT by bigbob (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bigbob

I was thinking that algae was being discredited due to the fact that technically it holds the most promise in the biofuel field (a bit of “political logic” that always seems to override reality - just as AGW is “political logic”. Where’s the vested interest?)
Just look at the potential yield versus soybean based biodiesel, algae is ahead with 50x per acre. What I would like to know about the algae process is if it can be fed a waste stream.


4 posted on 03/08/2009 3:56:33 PM PDT by Fred Hayek (Leftism is a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson