Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Perdogg

Her “current” hairstyle (a very simple cut, but great color) is very basic...yet you never see her doing something (anything) different stylewise. Keeping the same cut, for a premier, you would wonder why no updo; curls; etc (though she did have small, no doubt diamond, berettes in place @ the Oscars). So I am guessing she is very “exacting” (ie not changeable) in her look.

It is her money, and a nice European trip for her “people.”. I just have to question why now such an “expense account” press release? Is it a personal swipe @ Aniston (remember the Angelina needs a 20mil necklace to wear to the Oscars?). Or is it just a reference to the excess of the rich and Aniston was just an easy target?

Who knows...but she should go back to the “Rachel.”. The curved under top layer softens sharper features (I still wear a version of the Rach!)


32 posted on 03/05/2009 8:06:33 AM PST by PennsylvaniaMom (Are you an FBI Agent? Actually, I 'm a stay at home mom...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: PennsylvaniaMom

Even with such a ‘plain’ hairstyle, it is still one of the most asked for styles at hair salons. As for the expense, her stylist is one of her best friends, so I can see this being no big deal for her. And you’re right, its her money to do with as she sees fit.


33 posted on 03/05/2009 8:08:50 AM PST by rintense (Go Israel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson