United States v. Lopez didn’t overrule Katzenbach v. McClung, Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States, or Daniel v. Paul.
Supreme Court jurisprudence on the Commerce Clause is tricky to follow, but I wouldn’t argue against the overuse of the Interstate Commerce Clause by pointing to the Civil Rights Acts. I think, both politically and logically, that’s an untenable position.
Does the info in post 53 offer any relief for the lady?