Ahhhhh.
Yet another attorney who redefines words the way he WANTS them to be defined - “illegal” under WHAT law? - in order to force reality to fit his own notions.
Your intitials aren’t WJC, are they?
>> Yet another attorney who redefines words the way he WANTS them to be defined - illegal under WHAT law? - in order to force reality to fit his own notions.
Under the law that broke us away from England.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
These words are the very basis of our Republic — that our rights emanate from the Creator (not from the government or even the Constitution). The word “inalienable” means precisely that. No government, and no Constitution, including our own, may legitimately or legally alienate these rights.
SnakeDoc