1 posted on
02/28/2009 3:44:46 PM PST by
Justaham
To: Justaham
To: Justaham
4 posted on
02/28/2009 3:57:15 PM PST by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: Justaham
If she was discharged and cannot serve why is she reporting for duty ?
To: Justaham
Which means she has no family care plan meaning she is discharged. General Patton didn’t have to put up with this, but now we have the volunteer “professional” force which is so much better.
7 posted on
02/28/2009 4:04:43 PM PST by
MSF BU
(++)
To: Justaham
Wasn’t this precise scenario one of the stronger arguments against allowing women to join the Army?
8 posted on
02/28/2009 4:05:58 PM PST by
DieHard the Hunter
(Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fà g am bealach.)
To: Justaham
According to what I read on FOX, she got the call-up in December of 2007. Unless that was a typo, her husband has had A WHOLE YEAR to find a new job that will enable him to stay home.
This couple looks like a pair of snot-nosed putzes to me.
10 posted on
02/28/2009 4:17:32 PM PST by
A_perfect_lady
(Think HollywoodÂ’s hit rock bottom? You forget how well they dig. (bighollywood.breitbart.com)
To: Justaham
A good reason to limit all obligations to a total of six years as used to be the norm. I got my Honorable DC two years after my four years active in the Navy were completed for a total of six years. I did two years US Army NG later on a two year contract. One year of drills and one year inactive. I got my Honorable DC from the Army when the second year had passed.
Having open ended no time restraint enlistment contracts is not healthy for the servicemember nor our military in general. The policy needs to be ended. If she joined in 2002 then 2008 should have been when she recieved a DC and the end of any and all including future obligations.
11 posted on
02/28/2009 4:22:24 PM PST by
cva66snipe
($.01 The current difference between the DEM's and GOP as well as their combined worth to this nation)
To: Justaham
First of all let me say “not guilty”.
Second, she’s going to be very surprised the the base commander calls Child Protective Services and they haul her kids off to foster care.
Third, I believe when you serve your active time that should be it. I served 4 then had 2 inactive. I could have been called back but, luckily, I wasn’t. And I wouldn’t have liked it had I been.
Fourth, it should be like it used to be. Get pregnant-get discharged. If the army wanted you to have a kid it would have issued one.
16 posted on
02/28/2009 4:55:09 PM PST by
Terry Mross
(I Hate All Politicians, Republicans Included.)
To: Justaham
” I don’t have a choice”
oh yes you do, sweeetheart. The army will make it for you.
20 posted on
02/28/2009 5:41:45 PM PST by
silverleaf
(Freedom's just another word for "nothing left to lose")
To: Justaham
Its a very sad story. Now get your family care plan ready and get your butt to Ft Benning.
22 posted on
02/28/2009 6:35:03 PM PST by
Bulldawg Fan
(Victory is the last thing Murtha and his fellow Defeatists want.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson