You said — “Instead of dealing with the corruption, you want to paste a new law on top of the old. You may be the deranged one, after all.”
In case you haven’t noticed — it’s *laws* that deal with corruption. When we saw the corruption with Obama’s Senate seat, it’s “laws” that pertain to the corruption for which someone is going to be “prosecuted”. Whenever we talk about corruption anywhere — it’s always a “law” that was broken and a “law” that pertains to a criminal case being prosecuted against the person (or persons) involved.
It’s *precisely* the *law* that counts. And that’s why the “law” is needed for the vetting process — to get rid of any of the “corruption” of this failed vetting process that we saw “in action” this last election...