[Star Traveler]

You were saying — “Oh yes, the foundation of Freedom. Let a crook run for office and get elected, then let them server there term doing maximum harm to the Republic while you enact a law that is common sense for thinking people.”

Well..., you’ll notice that you (and others) — “let” — him run for office and get elected. Since you said this (above), the question could be raised to you and others, “Why did you let him run?”

You see..., there’s the “reality” of the situation, you let him run for office.

On the other hand, with the law in place that I’m talking about, if one does not produce the required documentation, then with this law I would not be letting him run. That’s the difference.

In the one case, you let him run — in the other case, with the law, I would not let him run.

—

And then you said — That’s not very conservative of you, nor is it American. I doubt Patrick Henry would have said’ “Aw lets make another law to stop them from killing freedom, or give me death!

Well, using your phraseology up above, it was not very conservative of you to have let him run for office, now was it?

And I think it’s very conservative of me to make it so he can’t run for office, if he does not produce the required paperwork.

[hedgetrimmer]

Well..., you’ll notice that you (and others) — “let” — him run for office and get elected.

That is a phony argument. Nobody applied for the ballot by requesting it from ordinary citizens.

It boils down that you are saying is that no average citizen should have any trust in the government.

You are saying that no average citizen can expect fraudsters from being prohibited because apparently no laws are being enforced, and that includes regulations that secretaries of states and county recorders must follow with respect to elections.

Your 'law' won't be enforced. How can we expect that if we cannot remove a crooked liar from office?

Claiming that the average citizen is at fault because Obama applied for the ballot with false information is pretty much a load of garbage.

Its not conservative of you to allow a crook to remain in office. Its not conservative of you to pretend that a new law would be enforced, when clearly election laws are clearly being flaunted by Obama and his crooked community organizing groups and crooked ballot counters. It's a laugh.

It would be credible of you to start by removing the crooks from office. Then we may be able to believe that a new law will help because it will have a chance at being enforced.