Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nufsed

You said — “I’m only commentiong on your first point because I believe you are fanatically fighting to avoid the truth being produced for some reason and I don’t want to stay around until you have an epiphany.”

I wasn’t fighting against producing the documentation. You can go back and search out my posts prior to the election. You’ll find that I wanted the documentation to be produced. So, you’re wrong there. It’s a long ways back, but my posts *are there* and they were asking for that very documentation that you’re talking about.

So, right off the bat, you’ve stated something that is untrue — in that I’m “fanatically fighting to avoid the truth being produced”...

What I am saying is that — I found out that there is no legal requirement to produce that specific documentation, after I asked for it to be produced.

Do you see the difference between the two?

I’m hoping so, because I’m giving you the *explanation* of *why* it was never produced. That’s not saying that I did *not* want it produced. It seems that people can’t pick up on these kinds of distinctions...

AND THEREFORE, once I found out that there is no legal requirement to *produce specific documentation* and that all the candidates ever did before (and in the present) was to sign statements that they are qualified — I found out that this meant that there was a *big loophole* in the system.

And it’s the existence of this *big loophole* in the system that requires the legislation be passed in the states requiring this specific kind of documentation be produced.

I really don’t know why people cannot “get it” when I explain this...

And then you said — “It is illogical, assinine, ridiculous, illogical, and supports fraud to say that there are qualifications for president but the people who approve the candidate for the ballot, the people in the electoral college and the congress have no responsibility to require the candidate produce the qualifications.”

Well, apparently this has been going on for a very long time. They haven’t made it a requirement for specific documentation before. What can I say? No one ever bothered for some reason. I didn’t know that and apparently neither did the posters here know that. Now we know...


254 posted on 02/26/2009 8:50:31 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies ]


To: Star Traveler
You are just making my point. No one has been doing the job. That doesn't mean they shouldn't when questions are asked.

It is clear for most president many knew where they were born. People come out of the wood work and put up plaques, signs etc. Nurses and docters and hospital staff come forwared. neigbhbors, store clearks, friends. When you know where the guy was born because there's 100 witnesses, no one bothers. But when that's not the case, someone has to do their job and require the documents.

We will continue to point out forever, that Mr. Transparency refused to open his files. Let his legacy be that of a fraud.

Again, you are on the wrong side if you don't call for the truth.

I'm out.

256 posted on 02/26/2009 8:55:33 PM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson