If by "involved" you mean privy to the actual planning, no.
But one could conclude Bush & Co. were the cops who "looked the other way."
Then as now it remains incongruous that the World Trade Center could get hit twice by hijacked jets with known Islamo-terrorists aboard, as well as the Pentagon (200 miles away from NYC) WITHOUT confrontation by ANY U.S. Air Defense.
Curious that you find yourself as an apologist for 0bama by discrediting Berg's Birth Cert investigation and attributing it to a "Derangement Syndrome" a la Bush; That makes it a "Two-fer" for you.
Will you be bleating much during 0bama's speech this evening?
Perhaps the poster will trat us to one of her fractured bible lessons tonight! [ as in the Good Samaritan ]
You asked — “Will you be bleating much during 0bama’s speech this evening?”
Well, I don’t like listening to Obama. I refused to listen and/or watch his inauguration or listen to his speech and I won’t listen to him now, either.
However, I will read some reports about it and see what the analysis is....
[... no Obama for me... thank you... ]
As a post on another part of your statement — “Curious that you find yourself as an apologist for 0bama by discrediting Berg’s Birth Cert investigation and attributing it to a “Derangement Syndrome” a la Bush; That makes it a “Two-fer” for you.”
It’s only those with “Obama Derangement Syndrome” who think I’m an apologist for Obama. I didn’t vote for him and I won’t even listen to his speeches..., but will go over analysis of his positions and read reports on the position of the administration on issues.
I campaigned against Obama prior to the election and saw that I lost — I got outvoted by the Obama people...
So, afterwards, I saw that the way to stop Obama was to properly vet him through state laws to that effect, which is what is being done in Oklahoma and Arizona.
And the ones who continue to beat a dead horse over what a court of law will do nothing about, and especially since Obama is the President and it takes an Impeachment hearing to do anything about that — they’re the ones who think that anyone who doesn’t go for their “Obama Derangement Syndrome” is a supporter of Obama... :-)
I just see what “reality is” — and go for what works, hence the route of “state laws” for vetting candidates. And furthermore, working on changing results for the elections of 2010 and 2012...
On the Berg issue, you said — “Then as now it remains incongruous that the World Trade Center could get hit twice by hijacked jets with known Islamo-terrorists aboard, as well as the Pentagon (200 miles away from NYC) WITHOUT confrontation by ANY U.S. Air Defense.”
Well, sorry, I’m not a “Phil Berg truther”... :-)
I don’t think Bush (”and company) had any knowledge that this attack was going to happen to us and the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Of course, there was already knowledge of an attempt out of the Philippines where closely similar was tried (but failed) But, there are lots of things, related to terrorists going on, all over the world. That’s why it’s been said it’s going to be impossible to stop the next big terrorist attack.
And, furthermore, when the attack did happen, I don’t think that there was any effort or any actions to impede US Air Defense from reacting to it.
If you’re a “Berg truther”... well..., so be it.. [it could explain your affinity for Berg and the Obama Derangement Syndrome, too...]