It's statements like this that make me absolutely hate government, someday I may just turn into an anarchist, forget conservative! A risk of getting cervical cancer is actually a NATURAL risk associated with living your life, a death that may not occur, but if it does it was done without anyone's help. Taking a drug is a man made risk,a death that occurs would not have if the drug had not been administered, so how can anyone say the benefits of this drug outweighs the risk? Yes, I know, some drugs for adults run risks also, but we are talking about children here and to tell you the truth 18 deaths or whatever they said in the article may just be the tip of the iceberg.
I guess this woman is supposed to take the attitude that, "Hey, she will never get cervical cancer!" and go on about her life as if her daughter didn't die in the name of heavyhanded, frickin' government interference, it does interfere in these matters, believe me.
What do you want to bet that the people who "continue to find" this are men?