Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: mowowie

I’m no expert. But I know a smattering of aerodynamics. It seems to me that the wings on that plane are very short and cocked the wrong way...no dihedral. Sounds like a recipe for unstable flight.

Back in the days of primitive electronics, I would expect this to be trouble.


6 posted on 02/15/2009 1:37:20 PM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mamelukesabre
I think you are confusing angle of incidence with dihedral. Dihedral is the angle of wing in relation to the vertical axis, not the longitudinal axis like you are referring to.

I also believe the F-104 design was modified with a reverse vertical stabilizer, using the forward slanted wings, they called it the X-27 Lancer. they also installed a larger and better engine. (General Electric J79) This was a much better design and stability problems inherent of the F-104 completely disappeared. They hoped this version would be ready for production by 1972. All in all it was a dream to fly from test pilot reviews.

25 posted on 02/15/2009 2:31:32 PM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (WHAT? Where did my tag line go? (ACORN))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: mamelukesabre

I’m wondering how much this plane would benefit with modern flight control computers.

Still obsolete but it would be an interesting and exciting experiment.


26 posted on 02/15/2009 2:34:47 PM PST by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: mamelukesabre

The wings had about 3 degree of anhederal iirc


48 posted on 02/15/2009 4:12:37 PM PST by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson