Okay, fair enough. To have that, she must be declared unfit. Being too poor to care for your kids is apparently not enough to be declared unfit. So the state will not take them, and she won’t give them up. What’s the alternative? This is a real question, folks, not rhetoric. Pogo didn’t have an answer, which is why he ran away. It seems to me that, given the above, the only vindication of your belief would be to send money. If I’m wrong, I want a cogent, intelligent argument why.
I wish all 14 children healthy and happy lives with enough food, clothes and toys for entertainment to have a good but simple life. I hope when they are old enough the children can understand why people are concerned, annoyed and angry at their mother’s presumption that the public and the taxpayers should take care of her and her children. You know in 15 to 20 years anyone of these kids will be writing a tell all book.
Given that her parents went bankrupt supporting her while she was raking in the $$$ in welfare for her current six, and she could afford very expensive in-vitro for another eight, I’m fairly confident any donations will go to support her lifestyle or for another in-vitro rather than these kids.
I am just hoping child services does their job. She’s raking in the welfare money (IOW, many have already donated by force) and staying with her parents. If she can’t take care of them with all that, then take them away. And it’s not just the money, we have a single mom (by choice) trying to look after 14 kids.