What? No Quig yet to add his transparent attempts at wise talk?
ALONG
soon to set us
ALL
in our
PLACE!
considered even 3% of the material on this thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2166563/posts?page=1243
And, that there's some sort of mental block and/or incapacity to consider the original post of this thread remotely fair-mindedly.
And now we have some perspective pontificating about wisdom . . . when that perspective probably wouldn't recognize wisdom if it bit them in the buns.
I wonder what it is about the UFO threads that seems to be a huge super magnet for the Mothers of all CHEAP SHOTS?
Seems to be some genetic, congenital or compulsively habitual . . . what . . .
1. Fear? . . .
2. Terror? . . .
3. Incapacity to assess remotely rationally super complex data sets? . . .
. . .
4. Being raised by parents who's major claim to communications fame was an insecurity based compulsion to mock their kids derisively regardless of what the kids did or didn't do??? . . .
5. An INCAPACITY to hold more than one disturbing data point in one's noggin at the same time? . . .
. . .
6. An INCAPACITY to treat frightfully traumatic potentials seriously? . . .
7. An INCAPACITY to tolerate different world views charitably? . . .
. . .
8. An INCAPACITY to face frightful prospects boldly, rationally? . . .
9. An INCAPACITY to avoid parading one's terminal level insecurities when confronted with massively complex data sets which don't conform to microscopically small pseudo-tidy little boxed constructions on reality? . . .
. . .
10. An INCAPACITY to have and/or demonstrate a robust warm, healthy, friendly form of humor? . . .
Great points, Spetznaz. Though I don't think it's remotely CERTAIN [to the average citizen . . . or even to the average serious investigator . . . what they ARE NOT any more than it's absolutely certain what they ARE.
I still think that Guy Malone of
Has the best handle on what the critters are.
Certainly my relative vigorously insisted that the craft were some--"ET's," some ours we'd been taught to build by the "ET's" and some which were jointly 'manned.'
IF, as I and Guy Malone (amongst others) are firmly convinced, that this whole field is enmeshed in the Oligarchy's work towards a tyrannical global government as predicted by The Bible . . . . planned for millenia from hell . . .
Then
In the whole of the phenomena; saturating all of the phenomena . . . will be Standard Operating Procedure--part of every cell and fiber of the phenomena.
I am at peace with the symmetry of the world now.
I have a theory on why Panda’s are so cute looking even as adults. Normally baby animals are cute and when they grow up that cuteness matures away. Panda’s are an exception since they are native to China and they need that cuteness to survive.
What do I mean? Well it’s well known that a Chinese person will eat just about anything (maybe that’s why there are so many of us). So given this hypothesis maybe…just maybe, Panda’s evolved cuteness so that the Chinese population wouldn’t eat them. It’s a great survival adaptation since no one likes to eat anything cute. Now that’s some food for thought.