You’re trying to make an argument where there is none. You stated that this does not cause cancer, because it’s derived from adult stem cells. But, the article in question features a therapy to encourage the growth of new blood supply, “angiogenesis,” in the legs of diabetes patients. I pointed out that anything encouraging angiogenesis runs the risk of also promoting the growth of new blood supply to neoplasms or tumors.
I have no axe to grind on adult stem cell therapies. I oppose the use of fetal tissues acquired via abortion for any purpose.
I am familiar with the role angiogenesis plays in the development of cancers, due to searching high and low for ways to help my dog, who I loved very much, with his cancer back in 2007. That is when I became familiar with the work of Judah Folkman.
Satisfied? A little less confused?
Not trying to argue. I’m simply unaware of any embryonic treatment that is not cancer causing. I am opposed to using fetuses as experiments.