You said — “Sure, and if you believe that, I’ve got some real estate you might like to buy.”
Well..., then for the next major terrorist attack on this country, which may wipe out an entire metropolitan area — let me ask you, then, “Where do we have the disaster camps right now to take care of those refugees?”
See post #46 for the wording of the bill and the purpose stated. That should clear it up. And, like I said — where do you put a displaced city of refugees for the next biological and/or nuclear attack on a major metropolitan area?
Oh sure, sure, of coooourse we can trust the benevolent instincts of this bill, since the wording is so benign.
Nobody would eeeever think of using these camps for anything other than housing refugees from a terrorist attack.