[bdeaner]

And taking a discussion on the web a tad too seriously, I might add, dude.

If you were to read the statement seriously, of course you'd have to come to the realization that your statements were in grave error, and that the study, if anything, supports the view that the drugs alter brain function, which is what they're supposed to do anyway -- whether that is for good and ill. So, the findings are meaningless with regard to any conclusions on the physiological etiology or basis for bipolar disorder.

[Tidbit]

I see that you failed to address the substance of my reply which is your off-putting style of posting. You do yourself no favors in making your case using all caps (which is considered cyber-shouting) and all that bolding for emphasis.

Using the phrase "what your problem is" in conversation and referring to somebody as "dude" isn't the most gracious or intelligent manner in which to make a point.

You could be absolutely correct, but if your replies make you look like an ass, who gives a rat's bum what you say?