To: bdeaner
Plus, because of a cocktail of vicious side-effects, anti-psychotics almost triple a persons risk of dying prematurely.Ah, but tripled from what baseline? that of a typical "healthy" person of the same age and gender or that of an unmedicated person with the same psychosis? (ses?).
If the question came down to "you are a clear danger to yourself and the community. We can sequester you in a hospital or, with the use of anti-psychotics, can let you rejoin society but you might die sooner," which do you choose? That's a whole different kettle of fish. I don't see the article being clear on that.
"What? time for another pill? just a second while I post this ..."
Later, FRiends :)
3 posted on
01/29/2009 6:30:45 PM PST by
NonValueAdded
(Confidential to MSM: "Better Red than Read" is a failed business model.)
To: NonValueAdded
well, it would seem one would have to add some version of, the psychiatric establishment, underpinned by the pharmaceutical industry, has glossed over studies showing that anti-psychotics cause extensive damage, the most startling being permanent brain atrophy to that question for a truely informed consent to be obtained.
11 posted on
01/29/2009 6:57:07 PM PST by
blueplum
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson