>>Eugenics and destruction of Christianity are core principles of Darwinism, do you reject these?<<
I would reject those... but I haven’t had to as Darwinism died out before I was born.
You can certainly call something else Darwinism if you want to but it mainly confuses the discussion.
I believe that evolutionary theory is used to confuse the discussion.
Can you tell me why acceptance of evolution is so critical to some if it is not part of a greater agenda? Can you cite a single scientific advancement in the past 150 years that was predicated on the theory of evolution? People want to place Darwin on the same level as Newton, Galileo, Einstein, et al, but the fact remains that not only are his theories are not only unproven, they aren't even that significant from a scientific standpoint.