And once again in all your blather you cannot name a force sufficient to accomplish the motion described by the coordinate system you prefer.
Meanwhile the Heliocentric model is ‘equally valid as a coordinate system’ while being superior in that it is easily explainable by the known and measurable force of gravity.
Not at all. Real science and real scientists have been quoted with statements that show that geocentrism and geokineticism are physically indistinguishable. Only people who have a philosophical problem rant and rave about things they know can't be proven. That doesn't stop you, however.
"And once again in all your blather you cannot name a force sufficient to accomplish the motion described by the coordinate system you prefer."
Now you know that geocentrism within GR doesn't use any force that you don't use in your own preferred coordinate system. You also know that you can't prove your preferred coordinate system, yet you rant and rave as though I am the only one who can't prove their position. That's where the hypocrisy comes in.
"Meanwhile the Heliocentric model is equally valid as a coordinate system while being superior in that it is easily explainable by the known and measurable force of gravity."
Then you don't understand what Einstein, Hoyle, Born and Ellis have said and are just blabbering.