Thanks Jim.
The atheist Darwinists LOVE to talk about science, because this diverts attention from their real agenda, which is eugenics.
Here are the “highlights” of Darwinist eugenics in just the past century:
Rachel Carson (author of “Silent Spring” which resulted in the DDT ban): 50-80 MILLION deaths and rising every year.
Margaret Sanger: 50 MILLION+ deaths worldwide EVERY YEAR (850 MILLION to 1.2 BILLION worldwide since 1900).
Stalin: 13 MILLION+ deaths.
Hitler: 12 MILLION+ deaths.
Mao: 50-80 MILLION deaths.
(And note that this only counts the genocide that can be directly attributed to them, if the wars initiated by Stalin, Mao and Hitler were included there would be close to 100 MILLION more.)
It's more than about eugenics. Did you ever see the way they advocate government control of education in the name of science? And keeping religion out of the public arena but only in the home or church, as if any one with any faith is a second class citizen?
The dirty secret is that they love death, so they actually think that all these deaths were a good deed. To eugenicists, all these deaths were not just an unfortunate by-product of over-zealous adherents (of course, they try to pin them on something else). Over-population is one of their creeds.
I am not saying every evolution promoter thinks that all these deaths are a good thing. But to a eugenics and over-population believer, thinning the herd is a good thing, at least in theory, and if it isn’t their family or themslves who are being thinned (at least involuntarily).
You do know that Stalin banned the teaching of Darwinian evolution, and sent evolutionary scientists to the gulag, don't you?