Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: wolfcreek

Obama exposing Geithner to the Senate in the light of his tax-evasion would not be a “thank-you” unless Geithner and those backing him had sufficient influence to ensure his nomination was approved.

If Obama had been the sole or even primary decision-maker here he certainly could have nominated someone without the baggage.

This being the case, I think most people misunderstand who patronises whom in the relationship between the interests Obama represents and those Geithner represents.

Geithner is not there to serve Obama, he’s there to manage him.


17 posted on 01/28/2009 12:00:45 PM PST by Philo-Junius (One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Philo-Junius

“Geithner is not there to serve Obama, he’s there to manage him.”

Absolutely. Barry was chosen, not only through his mother and her Coomie asociates but, by Zbigniew
Brzezinski while at Columbia U. (You can throw Soros and the elites at CFR into that group)


22 posted on 01/28/2009 12:26:03 PM PST by wolfcreek (There is no 2 party system only arrogant Pols and their handlers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson