No, it is not. What you are defining as “evolution” is not the evolution being presented. You have a bias. You believe in a God who is guiding the process, albeit invisibly, undetectibly (is that a word?).
Evolution, as it is presented today, requires agreement to “common descent” (go to Talk.Origins). The origin of the single original life form is addressed only insofar as they are certain that some form of abiogenesis occurred, but they shy away from how. From that point on, all change is random (defined as “no intervention necessary”) and controlled by natural selection. So, I am not “saddling” a definition that the industry does not itself hold.
And, just because you can work side by side with a person who denies the Creator, does not mean that the two viewpoints are compatible. May I state again, “science” which excludes the management of the universe by the Mind that made it and controls it is not compatable with the biblical perspective. My response was to the issue as to whether God used evolution to create the life forms we now see. While He may have used adaptation and selection, He did not use an unguided, undirected process. The evolutionary biologist folks want us to admit that intervention is unecessary.
And, yes, you are right, Biological science is productive. Not all biology is based upon “evolution”. But, that which is based upon evolution as described in Talk.Origins may be productive. Then, so is the Playboy mansion, so is China, so is Christopher Hitchens. Are they compatable with biblical Christianity? If you mean, can they coexist? Then, sure. If you mean are they based upon the same assumptions, have the same underpinnings, express the same intentions? Then, no, they are not.
Your remarks with respect to whether that “life is incapable of staying exactly the same...” is your speculation. Even the scientific method would not support your conclusion that nothing could arise in the future that could begin to make a life form stay static. All you can do is say, thus far we observe that this is the case.
Life, as it exists, is absolutely and completely incapable of staying exactly the same. DNA is a molecule subject to change through mutation, DNA replication itself is a process that introduces mutation.
As such evolution is the inescapable result of life being imperfect replicators.
I don’t get my view of Science from Talk.Origins or any other creationist source; I am a scientists and I get my views on Science from other scientists. Nobody in their scientific work claims that evolution or any OTHER random process excludes God. God apparently is quite fond of using processes that are random in biology and physics and elsewhere, and science is incapable of discerning “truly random” from “random but under the control of God”.
Once again in case you feel compelled to go off on the word “random”, randomness is in no way out of the control of God; EVERY result of any random process is (if you believe the Bible)directed by God.
“The dice are cast into the lap, but every result is from the Lord” Prov 16:33