Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Dutchboy88
Science can only deal with what is measurable and can be compelled to act replicably and predictably. Do you propose that God is measurable, that God can be made to act replicably and predictably?

Science has no mechanism to either include or exclude God. For those of us who are Christians or people of faith (as the majority of scientists in the USA are) it is axiomatic. ALL things in creation are of God. For those that do not share this faith, the data still speaks for itself.

I am not demanding that science be “granted” “the preeminent spot in the universe”; I merely point out that science does what it does, and what it does is science, and science cannot include God and still be science.

78 posted on 01/27/2009 1:49:34 PM PST by allmendream ("Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream

Yes, I think God is about 6’ 4” and really tan.

Please read the entire argument. The matter in front of us is “...could evolution be a product of God.” The answer is no, because by definition (theirs not ours) evolution understands no direction in any part of the natural selection process. It is therefore, by extension, random events unguided and directionless. These assumptions are not compatible with biblical Christianity.

I am not addressing the intention of science nor do I dispute the contention that all things are a creation of God. That is my position. When a branch of that discipline (evolutionary biology) requires the omission of the possibility of a “guide” to all events irrespective of their appearance as random, we have hit an impasse.


81 posted on 01/27/2009 2:29:44 PM PST by Dutchboy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson