CYA.
1 posted on
01/26/2009 11:45:17 AM PST by
BGHater
To: BGHater
Also, if a court decided that Mrs Fuld did not pay enough for the mansion, the transfer be deemed to be "fraudulent conveyance" that would render the move void. Ya think?
2 posted on
01/26/2009 11:47:02 AM PST by
Lurking in Kansas
(Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down their level, then beat you with experience.)
To: BGHater
I thought residential property in Florida was protected from lawsuits. Didn’t OJ use that dodge to avoid paying the Goldmans?
3 posted on
01/26/2009 11:47:10 AM PST by
jalisco555
("My 80% friend is not my 20% enemy" - Ronald Reagan)
To: BGHater
I’ll give her $200 for it. 100% profit.
4 posted on
01/26/2009 11:48:58 AM PST by
Mojave
(Own a pit bull; own the consequences.)
To: BGHater
“Ex-Lehman chief sold $13m home to wife for $100”
Gee, why not $50?
6 posted on
01/26/2009 11:49:25 AM PST by
nuconvert
( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
To: BGHater
10 posted on
01/26/2009 11:54:46 AM PST by
maggief
To: BGHater
Florida law exempts ones homesteaded primary residence from exposure to lawsuits and bankruptcy. In order to claim homestead one must be a “domiciled” Florida resident. A Florida resident is not prevented from visiting other states but dual residents such as our snowbirds are not entitled to homestead their property.
12 posted on
01/26/2009 11:56:45 AM PST by
scottteng
(IMPEACH OBAMA)
To: BGHater
How can you love and respect a man who would shaft so many people?
How could you not have anything but disdain and contempt for such a rotten person?
To: BGHater
Incredibly stupid move..because there is no way it can hold up..
19 posted on
01/26/2009 12:12:21 PM PST by
ken5050
(Don't blame me, I voted for Palin!!)
To: BGHater
If she had divorced him, she could have gotten the house for nothing...
22 posted on
01/26/2009 12:29:42 PM PST by
iowamark
To: BGHater
Richard Fuld, the disgraced former chief executive of Lehman Brothers, sold his $13.3 million (£9.6 million) Florida mansion to his wife in November for $100, according to real estate records. Is the $13.3 million, less the $100, subject to income tax for his wife?
27 posted on
01/26/2009 12:54:55 PM PST by
RJL
To: BGHater
incompetent legal reporting.
it is easy enough to see if the property is declared homestead property.
Florida Statutes Section 222 controls homestead creditor exemptions. (FL uses their state rather than their federal exemptions)
If they have had their property for two years then it is wishful thinking on the part of the creditors.
Also, there is a ONE YEAR insider preference transfer period. It is only protected after ONE year after the transfer date.
Again, sloppy incomplete and incompetent reporting.
30 posted on
01/26/2009 1:06:49 PM PST by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: BGHater
This guys so smart, why wasn’t the house in a Trust to begin with?
To: BGHater
Good. Not my government, screw it out of every cent you can, in every way. The sooner it dies, the sooner we can get back to a Constitutional Republic, and not this faux democratic trainwreck that I am expecte to pay for and salute.
Take the bailout. Minimize the tax liability. Stick it to The Man.
To: BGHater
The rich are indeed different.
They tend to have much better legal advisors than you or I.
40 posted on
01/26/2009 7:29:07 PM PST by
Tainan
(Where's my FOF Indicator?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson