Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CottShop
Good golly! You mean ID scientists who are shunned ridiculed, ostracised, belittled, maligned and subjectively dismissed out of hand aren’t published more often? Gosh- I can’t understand it-

Are you suggesting they are shunned at their own websites? They build websites, solicit manuscripts, and then malign the people who submit articles?

335 posted on 01/23/2009 1:11:07 PM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies ]


To: js1138

You know what I’m talking about JS- and it isn’t on their own websites- you also know that htere have been articles posted to peer reviews- As well, you also know that peer review isn’t the onus upon which science rests-, and you also know that peer reviewed articles of ID and young earth have been posted and have stood now for decades- if you don;t then you haven’t researched the issue very well- not goign to get into an irrelevent pissing match comparing the size of any sides evidneces when you know full well a great many important discoveries were NEVER peer reviewed, nor falsified, nor predicted. If you want to discuss the central issues we’ve been discussing in this thread- fine- but not going to get sucked into diversionary rabbit trails that do nothign but try to take the emphasis off the evidneces, and into arguments about who has more or bigger scientific bicepts when the fact is that these type arguments don’t amount to a pisshole in the snow anywasys


336 posted on 01/23/2009 2:08:31 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson