I might point out that forensics doesn’t rely on just one line of evidence. You have been defending Behe, but if you read his books and articles you would know that he accepts evolution, common descent and an ancient earth. For all the same reasons that convince mainstream biologists.
His theoretical objection does not deal with speciation, which seldom involves new complex structures. His work is concerned with a few instances of evolution. The flagellum is the primary one.
Behe doesn’t concern himself with complex structures like the bones of the inner ear, because the fossil evidence for gradual evolution is detailed and overwhelming.
Instead, he chooses a mechanism too small to have left a fossil record. But even there his objections are failing.
[[You have been defending Behe, but if you read his books and articles you would know that he accepts evolution, common descent and an ancient earth.]]
Yeah? And you’r point? I don’t care what Behe beleive OUTSIDE the science- He can beleive little green frogs invented plutonium for all I care- the ONLY thing that matters is the science and whether it is sound or not.
[[For all the same reasons that convince mainstream biologists.]]
Lol- ‘convince’? You mean attempt to justify via assumptions their a priori bleeif
[[Behe doesn’t concern himself with complex structures like the bones of the inner ear, because the fossil evidence for gradual evolution is detailed and overwhelming.]]
Lol- Ah yes- the ‘inner ear evolution’ claim again0- Yep- it’s ‘ovwerwhelming’ - in fact, it’s such a sound evidentiary line that evolutionists had to DECEIVE the common reader by drawing the skull of a a rat sized animal the same size as the next species inline supposedly, A HIPPO SIZED ANIMAL, and claim the jawbone movement showed clear progression ‘toward the ear’
Wow0- if you’re tryign to use ear evolution as your defense fro macroevolution, then your hypothesis really is in serious trouble-
Let us also point out what Miller is trying to do by ‘explaining’ the suppsoed evolution of blood clotting- Yup- that’s right- He is cosntructing an itneligently designed scenario that ignores problems, oversimplifies the seriousness and complexities of hte issue, and protects and invents scenarios that do not exist but whould be absolutely necessary to even begin the long complicated process of ‘evolving’ complex clotting
[[JS- I don’t have the time to go through that site line by line
Get back to me when you have time for something better than name calling.]]
I called you a name? Or miller? Get back to me when you’re not willing to run from discussions that point out the rediculousness of macroevolutionary claims by Darwinian congregationalists who can’t fathom that anythign but nature could be the causation of life- Btw- the article I’m goign to be looking at is on Metainformation- somethign else Miller seems unaware of, or at least is tryign to downplay and hide from the public because it blows his mythical hypothesis out of hte water- Genetic information and changes all fall within species specific metainfo- trying to produce non species psecific info lies outside hte metainfo parameters, informaiton is useless in life without a controlling, directing metainfo controlling it within hte parameters and for which it was designed for- The evolution of blood clotting ignores this basic life fact.