To: tacticalogic
You said this in post 248...
"I am not interested in discussing vague claims about what anonymous "evos" have or have not said." And now this in this post....."If youve got a problem with CM, take it up with him. Do you want to be treated and addressed as an individual, with your own ideas and arguments, or just one of those creos?"
So which is it? You want specifics or not? You aren't interested in unsubstantiated comments and when I give specifics, you criticize that as well.
Make up your mind.
269 posted on
01/21/2009 7:53:37 PM PST by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: metmom
I said I was interested in talking to you about your idea and your arguments. That's what I posted a question in response to. When you tried to change the subject to someone else's arguments, I tried to explain that it wasn't what I was asking about.
I'm trying to talk to you about your ideas and arguments. I'm finding that very hard to do. You want to talk to me about someone else's arguments, and I've got someone else who can't seem to understand the I don't want to talk to them about yours, I want to talk to you about them.
271 posted on
01/21/2009 8:22:11 PM PST by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson