[[What, in your opinion, are the “IC” parts of the blood clotting cascade?]]
Behe described them in his rebuttal to Miller’s deceitful slight-of-hand deconstruction of hte reducible aspects of hte IC systems- you’ll find his rebuttal on his site ‘arn.org’ I beleive it is
>> What, in your opinion, are the “IC” parts of the blood clotting cascade?
> Behe described them in his rebuttal to Miller’s deceitful slight-of-hand
> deconstruction of hte reducible aspects of hte IC systems- you’ll
> find his rebuttal on his site ‘arn.org’ I beleive it is
Was it this paper?
http://www.arn.org/docs/behe/mb_indefenseofbloodclottingcascade.htm
Because, if so, he doesn’t really address which parts of the original cascade are “irreducible”.
I think Casey Luskin, as js pointed out, did explicitly list them. A copy of his diagram is here:
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/files/2009/01/luskin-fig-5.jpg
The “irreducible” parts are, supposedly, the ones in the red box on the left.
Problem is that Russel Doolittle from UCSD just published last year a study of the lamprey genome, and factor V (in the red box) does not exist.
See further discussion here: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/01/02/smoke-and-mirrors-whales-and-lampreys-a-guest-post-by-ken-miller/
