> All Behe does is propose some structure as being
> irreducible, and when it is shown to be reducible, he
> backpedals. Not a strong position.
>
> It’s greatest weakness as a line of argument is that we
> now have the tools and technology to test it.
Does he still have any structures that he claims are “irreducible” that haven’t been shown not to be?
The blood clotting cascade is toast. What’s left?
[[The blood clotting cascade is toast. What’s left?]]
actually it and other exampels are not toast- the ONLY thing- once again, that was demonstrated in response ot his claism was that YES, IC systems can contain reducible parts- BUT the IC parts can NOT be reduced-
Actually the blood clotting cascade is rattling around zombie-like at the Discovery Institute. They recently made some claims that could easily have been avoided by a literature search. Another necessary component that isn't.