Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DManA

I’m probably going to get flamed, but I think that President Bush is respecting the Constitutional balance of power by commuting sentences rather than granting pardons.


8 posted on 01/19/2009 7:16:17 PM PST by Paul Heinzman (Hell, I can get you a toe by 3 o'clock this afternoon... with nail polish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Paul Heinzman

What...What did Clinton do for Marc Rich?....and the FALN terrorists?


10 posted on 01/19/2009 7:20:04 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Heinzman
There is no "constitutional balance of power" when it comes to pardons. The President's power to pardon is unlimited.

"W"'s just refusing to pardon these men because he screwed up and let them get prosecuted needlessly.

He's too embarrassed to admit it. He will be haunted by that fact until the day he dies.

12 posted on 01/19/2009 7:25:22 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Heinzman

Pardons are one of Constitutional powers of the Presidency. The founders gave it to him in the NAME OF BALANCE. He would be disrespecting that balance BY GIVING IT UP.


14 posted on 01/19/2009 7:43:25 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Heinzman

WRONGO.

The Constitution (unfortunately) gives the President unfettered power of pardon.


24 posted on 01/19/2009 8:33:32 PM PST by dodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson