Who cares what the rest of the world thinks?
When the rest of the world cares what we think, then I will give that statement consideration.
I mentioned rights because only governments censor, and rights are in place in counter to that.
Again, the perceptions of the rest of the world be damned.
Counter point is that such sites are disallowed due to the perceptions of the world being that if you allow such sites, then you are affiliated and or openly support such nonsense.
Yes, well, you'll forgive me for using your same metric in your case.
I mentioned rights because only governments censor, and rights are in place in counter to that.
That, of course, is BS. The MSM spikes, censors, and blacks out *lots* of data with no government encouragement or authority whatsoever, so your point is invalid, and your assertion is incorrect.
Counter point is that such sites are disallowed due to the perceptions of the world being that if you allow such sites, then you are affiliated and or openly support such nonsense.
You know, Jim made his own point from a far stronger philosophical basis: Private property, and subjective judgment being absolute over that property. Let him fight his own battles, he's better at them than you are.