There was a 1/14/09 article on townhall.com that said they were going to meet Wednesday afternoon.
“The Obama transaction team said the two (0bama/Biden) would visit the court at the invitation of Chief Justice John Roberts”.
With 31 court cases thrown under the bus, the photo makes it look like a 0bama celebration of his deceit of the American people. I don’t expect anything to happen now that the messiah has blessed the court with his presence.
I am really disappointed in John Roberts, after his confirmation hearing I ‘Thought’ he would be as good as he appeared. What a waste of legal knowledge he is, now that he clearly shows his true feelings about the constitution and how it is irrelevant now.
Bring it on Barry, appoint more liberal judges because nothing much matters now.
There are some opinions out there as to why SCOTUS hasn't acted....just yet.
From the same place I referenced this pic (at the top of the page at the moment):
"The Supreme Court had to wait until now for Berg to have standing. There is no precedence for this case. It is a historical decision and they will do everything they can to get it right. The constitution does not establish who vets the candidate. Part of their decision will determine who, or what will be held responsible in the future, if not now. It could destroy the Democratic Party if they are proved to be part of an intentional fraud. If Obama does not provide the documentation they request, he will be held in contempt, and they WILL obtain it.
Here's another view of this chess game. It explains how the SCOTUS has Obama in Check Mate.
Both Donofrio's and Wrotnowski’s cases said the burden lays with the Secretary of State (SoS) not doing their job. There is no law that states that it is their job. So, the SoS would win the case. In Conference, they probably talked about who was responsible to vet the candidate. If it wasn’t the SoS of each state, they did not want to waste valuable court time and not hold Obama accountable. The burden to each SoS to vet each candidate for each office would be prohibitive in both time and expense. You will notice that neither cases were completely released but pending. They can be revisited and opinions may be written on them when a final release is given. Berg’s case, on the other hand, places the burden on the candidate, the party, and the FEC. Berg, however, did not have standing until Congress certified the electoral votes to present his case. He now has standing, as do Keyes and the other California cases."