Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Windows 7 Beta Free Download
slickdeals.net ^ | 1/14/08

Posted on 01/14/2009 2:24:27 PM PST by martin_fierro

http://slickdeals.net/permadeal/17245

Microsoft offers a Free Download of Windows 7 Beta starting today. Windows 7 Beta will expire on August 1, 2009.

Note: The minimum requirements for running Windows 7 are a PC with a 1 Ghz Processor, 1GB of RAM, 16 GB of disk space, 128MB of video memory and support for DX9 graphics.

After downloading, make sure to install media patch (32 bit or 64 bit) to fix a few issues with media files and mp3 corruption


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Computers/Internet; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: lowqualitycrap; somuchforvista; unnngh; windows7; windowsse7en
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: OnTheDress

“Windows 7 Beta Free Down Crapload...

sorry “

So we take it you’ve actually used it or are you just pulling out the stock Windows bash out of your rear?


21 posted on 01/14/2009 2:44:43 PM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: benjibrowder

if you already download windows 7 previously, do you need to download it again to get the august 2009 expiration date


22 posted on 01/14/2009 2:57:29 PM PST by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

can this be run off a thumb drive?


23 posted on 01/14/2009 3:00:39 PM PST by guitarplayer1953 (Psalm 83:1-8 is on the horizon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

No.

Windows 7 expires August 1st no matter which ‘build’ you have.

If you don’t have Build 70000, You may want to download it for the added updates, but more than likely you’re fine.


24 posted on 01/14/2009 3:14:35 PM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: guitarplayer1953

If you can boot from it, and it has at least 16 gb of space, then probably.


25 posted on 01/14/2009 3:15:38 PM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

I meant Build 7000....not 70000....

:(


26 posted on 01/14/2009 3:16:33 PM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: benjibrowder
From what I’ve heard, Windows 7 is supposed to be a whole new ballgame compared to Vista.

From what I've heard, it's vista with a new dress and makeup. There's no way this is a complete rewrite from vista. Not in this short of time.

27 posted on 01/14/2009 3:37:36 PM PST by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

I have 1 Win3.1, ~3 W95, ~4 W98SE, 0 WME, -5 W2k, ~2 WXP, 0 Vista, 0 Apple, ~4 Linux/BSD computers. Beta anything from M$ is not worth my time. QED.


28 posted on 01/14/2009 3:37:51 PM PST by Paladin2 (No, pundits strongly believe that the proper solution is more dilution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
So far openSUSE 11.1 is running great. Still usng KDE 3.x though, 4.1x is installed but not enough apps, especially powerdevil are up to speed for me yet.

Playing around with VirtualBox on an Athlon 3000+ machine, and Xen on a Core2 x86_64 version.

You play around with any VM configs?

29 posted on 01/14/2009 3:42:25 PM PST by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

I use rds/vm’s for corporate work (one server uses 160 vm’s)
each of those can server 40 term sessions


30 posted on 01/14/2009 3:45:14 PM PST by xcamel (The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

I have no issues with vista, I tried this beta, I really didnt see much difference, sidebar is gone and the task bar is a little different. seemed pretty stable I would imagine some the luddites here would say it sucks. 16 bit software...geez people there are things called UPDATE! lol.


31 posted on 01/14/2009 3:46:51 PM PST by 09Patriot (I am a MILITANT Conservative, compassionate conservatism got us NOWHERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

no, he probably has dialup and would take 4 weeks to download it.


32 posted on 01/14/2009 3:47:58 PM PST by 09Patriot (I am a MILITANT Conservative, compassionate conservatism got us NOWHERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

All I know is, for the majority of everyone who tried it, it was much better than Vista.

But there were some changes. The classic menu bar has faded away. Gone. Still, I think I will stick to OS X.


33 posted on 01/14/2009 3:49:23 PM PST by benjibrowder (Looking forward to kicking Obama out of office in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
I have no need for 160 VM's at the moment :) Just one or two will do.

On the machine I'm trying out virtualbox, I'm trying to use the already installed Win2K partition. Can't find my W2K media to install into an image file from scratch, but I think it's taking issue with the GRUB MBR.

34 posted on 01/14/2009 3:52:29 PM PST by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

the secret command:
chainloader +1

(it’s burried in the man pages)


35 posted on 01/14/2009 3:53:40 PM PST by xcamel (The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: All
I downloaded it to try it out.
Seems like vista to me.
(but I haven't explored it very much yet)

I'd appreciate a heads-up if anyone comes up with a patch/fix for the lightscribe problem.
(won't install)
36 posted on 01/14/2009 3:56:53 PM PST by novemberslady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: benjibrowder

I went with Vista 2 years ago when I had to replace my laptop. What a waste of money! I much prefer the 2003 desktop that runs XP. What they did to Word is a crime.

I need to upgrade the hardware on my desktop, but I am very dubious about buying a new system with Windows 7.


37 posted on 01/14/2009 3:58:38 PM PST by neocon1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

38 posted on 01/14/2009 4:00:39 PM PST by steve-b (Intelligent design is to evolutionary biology what socialism is to free-market economics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Some of us downloaded and installed it this past weekend. I can dual boot Vista or Windows 7 now. I’m quite impressed with it so far. Why I’m even typing this reply from Windows 7.

I wouldn’t try to upgrade an old computer with Windows 7. XP is a fine operating system if you already have it.

The Windows haters have their own agenda. Take anything they say with a grain of salt.


39 posted on 01/14/2009 4:05:30 PM PST by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

There’s no need for a rewrite. Microsoft’s stated plan was for a new release three years after Vista and they are on pace for that. Windows 7 will largely be based on Vista, and with good reason - Vista is actually quite stable and secure.


40 posted on 01/14/2009 4:09:01 PM PST by flintsilver7 (Honest reporting hasn't caught on in the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson