Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: VietVet

You would never have them in the quantities neccessary to turn the tide, and those that you did have would quickly be eliminated. Remember, the taliban used to have tanks and heavy artillery, thats gone now, because its impossible to utilise and conceal them against a western army...


43 posted on 01/14/2009 5:15:37 AM PST by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: sinsofsolarempirefan

Oh clueless one, the Taliban don’t work in the factories that make the tanks and airplanes, or the missiles and bombs, or drive the trucks that deliver same along with food and fuel, to those they would combat.

Big difference.


105 posted on 01/15/2009 7:01:17 PM PST by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: sinsofsolarempirefan

Haven’t you got the analogy backwards? The Taliban was the tyranical central government; the Northern Allience was the rural-based insurection. They both had left over Soviet heavy weapons. The Taliban could not finally defeat the NA; the NA could not drive out the Taliban, until the Americans sent them aid and air support.

Also, neither the Taliban nor the NA had anything like the technological economy and society that the US does, although the Afgans do have some spectaculary talented gunsmiths who can duplicate even modern small arms with 18th-19th Century hand tools.

VietVet


124 posted on 01/18/2009 4:10:18 PM PST by VietVet (I am old enough to know who I am and what I believe, and I 'm not inclined to apologize for any of)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson