Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: GreatOne

Well, I’ll disagree. I think Blyleven belongs. I didn’t collect or even look at baseball cards, I watched baseball.


7 posted on 01/12/2009 11:38:12 AM PST by SoDak (Molon Labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SoDak

Based upon what. When was Bert even the best pitcher on his own staff, much less the league? Three or four times, maybe? Personifies “good, but not great.” Hung around long enough to get some good stats. Just because a mistake was made with Sutton doesn’t mean it should be compounded with Blyleven. His contemporaries who have made it so far (Palmer, Seaver, Jenkins, Niekro, Hunter, Carlton, and Perry) are head and shoulders better than him.


24 posted on 01/12/2009 11:57:51 AM PST by GreatOne (You will bow down before me, Son of Jor-el!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: SoDak
Blyleven and Tommy John both belong. While they didn't have the dominating star power of a Sandy Koufax, their longevity and career stats are feats which entitle them to the Hall of Fame.

Ditto for Ron Santo. He has a higher career batting average than Mike Schmidt, most of it during the pitcher's era from 1962-69, whereas Schmidt played most of his career afterward. Santo could field almost as well as Brooks Robinson, the gold standard for third basemen, and completely outshined him in producing runs. Nobody but an idiot will argure Schmidt or Robinson don't belong. With Santo being so close to both, I don't see how he can keep getting passed over either.

66 posted on 01/12/2009 1:54:16 PM PST by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or, are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson