[Coyoteman]

Evoloserism is about lifestyles, not about science.

The theory of evolution is about science because it follows the scientific method.

Creationists and their critiques of evolution have yet to produce any scientific evidence to counter the theory. All they have is religious apologetics.

And Ted, your nasty little slur does not even come close to being evidence. I presume you posted it because that's all you've got.

[wendy1946]

Question, Mr. Darwin Central moderator, which part of the lifestyle do you figure you're gonna get to take with you? The duck? The goat?? What exactly prompted all of you losers to leave FR and set up DC? Somebody figured out that evoloserism and conservativism weren't compatible??

[dangus]

>> Creationists and their critiques of evolution have yet to produce any scientific evidence to counter the theory. All they have is religious apologetics. <<

Uh, no. The problem is that creationism has its own serious scientific issues: The world seems to be billions of years old, and creationism doesn’t do a very good job of explaining that.

As far as debunking evolution: How could it be debunked? Evolutionary biology hasn’t begun to explain how it COULD happen, let alone demonstrate how it DID happen. We haven’t seen one species shown to transform “horizontally” into another species, let alone how one species evolves “upward” from a simpler creature to a more complex one. For all the years of proclaiming life being created in a test-tube, all we’ve got is some uracil (not even the RIGHT nucleotide) in a testtube, and now a demonstration that RNA can be induced to self-replicate.