Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman

And much of it was based upon pure conjecture. Please not this old 2005 case, again. The judge had an axe to grind and Penn. is a small state. Look around, why didn’t everyone leap at his “wisdom”? Evidence.


2 posted on 01/08/2009 8:04:33 PM PST by Dutchboy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dutchboy88
The judge did a bit of over-reach. Just for hypothetical giggles and squeaks, you can imagine what would happen should that judge be present when W.D. Fard's mothership would appear in the sky and save all the black Moslems and leave the judge to be washed away in the flood.

I know I'd be shaken up myself, but, Fur Shur, I would not have ruled out the possibility that such a thing could exist given the size and age of this universe.

The judge's reach into the utiity and efficacy of what he construed to be religious beliefs went way beyond the needs of the case. That's why he's usually thought of as a fascist, and most likely the reason no one but "pure thought, true beliefs" types keep bringing that case up.

4 posted on 01/08/2009 8:11:13 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson