You said — “If the courts do not require him to produce his documents, we will make sure that the issue does not die and that history will hang a cloud over his presidency. There is more than one way to “make” someone do something.”
Why would the courts be wrong about it. I thought that the Supreme Court gave the final word on the matter. I’m more than willing to let the Supreme Court determine what the situation is for Obama. That’s their job. And if they decide one way — that’s fine and if they decide the other way — that’s fine too — because that’s what we all invest the Supreme Court as their job. They are the last word, even if (at times) it’s “no word” at all... :-)
So, are you saying you wouldn’t accept the Supreme Court’s actions if you don’t believe they should decide the way that they do?
I’m willing to accept the answer from them — so I don’t know why you wouldn’t be willing to.
If the court or the congress do not review his qualifications, then thousands of us will pursue the matter as best we can.
But if it's "no word" it's not the last word, because it means they said anything, they just decided not to decide. But they mostly haven't even done that yet, other than denying requests for pre argument injunctions and such. They have not ruled on the merits of the case, and haven't even said they weren't going to take the case in several instances.
The fat lady may be warming up her pipes, but she hasn't sung yet. She may never sing, she may sing after January 20th, which could be a mess as the audience starts hurling rotten fruit at the others on stage, or she my sing Obama's song, before or after January 20th.