Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CE2949BB; marktwain; HairOfTheDog
Officers had handcuffed her estranged husband, but she came clean, telling them she had hit herself.

Had she followed up with a few rounds to his chest instead of coming clean, we'd have another pristine self defense shooting.

8 posted on 01/01/2009 1:33:24 PM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RGSpincich

I made a similar point about the recent case of the woman who shot the man alleged to have abused her son in court, having died of cancer.

To many posters here she was a hero for killing a “paedophile”, despite the fact that the man had been found guilty of nothing as he was in court awaiting his trial. Maybe the guy was as guilty as hell but until he’d had his trial no one could know for sure, but just like if a woman accuses a man of abuse he is automatically assumed to be guilty so many posters take the position that if a man is accused of being a paedophile he must automatically be guilty and should be shot on sight.

People need to understand that the Bill of Rights is their friend.


47 posted on 01/01/2009 4:48:40 PM PST by PotatoHeadMick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: RGSpincich
Had she followed up with a few rounds to his chest instead of coming clean, we'd have another pristine self defense shooting.

LOL - touché ;~)

52 posted on 01/01/2009 6:27:45 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson