Posted on 12/26/2008 6:48:08 AM PST by Free America52
First off, the biggest ass-kissing media refers to Michelle Obama as a 'distinguished attorney" despite the fact that Michelle Obama has been"inactive" since 1993.
(Excerpt) Read more at atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com ...
Michelle was an African studies major at Princeton. I assume that is the same as the Ethnic studies program that we have at the University of WA. The course is a joke. One of the classes at the U of WA was entitled Minorities in the Military. The whole course requirement was to write a paper about how someone in your family was treated in the military. I suggested to a student that she write about her uncle’s experience during the Bataan March. She said that wasn’t the kind of experience that they were looking for.
The girl that I know got into law school as well. Her roommate was mad because she was a full blooded Indian, whose father was the VP of a bank, and she didn’t get in to U. WA. because she wasn’t an affirmative action student. Her parents were paying full tuition. She did get a late acceptance, though.
“Well, well, well . . .At the first hint of any negative Obama news, non-sequitur (logical fallacy) tries to come to the rescue again. Man your fingers must be down to the nubs by now.”
LOL! I wonder how non-sequitur feels about Odumbo being compared to his (non-sequitur’s) object-worship Abe Lincoln?
you cite a blog. there is a post that's typewritten, no link, no attachement, from something called "ardc" that appears to have editorial mixed with actual content -- if it is actual content from the site. there are idiotic photoshopped images everywhere on the thread.
If I'm looking for real information, why would I waste my time here?
Well then, don’t bother.
Sort of like OJ's friend Robert Kardashian who was not a practicing attorney (due to disbarrment) at the times OJ talked to him after Nicole's murder, but Judge Ito and the prosecuting attorneys made no obection to Kardashian reestablishing credentials so those conversations could retroactively have "attorney-client privelege".
This is NOTHING. My Illinois license was similarly placed in inactive status by the ARDC when I moved to Ohio and stopped keeping my Illinois law license active. I can reactivate it by paying the active lawyer fees and by taking all required Continuing Legal Education courses, just as Michelle Obama could do.
I included that information for people interested in the truth. Since that doesn't include you I'm surprised you bothered to read it.
With the frogmarching of Michelle and Obama pics one should ask your intentions for this forum.
They do this at DU with Bush, Cheney and Rove.
Ummm, I didn’t post the pictures of the frog marching, just the link to the article.
She probably just stopped paying dues when she didn’t need the licensed.
There’s no way she’s a “distinguished attorney.”
There was a piece on FR a few months back about her brief tenure at a distinguished law firm, Sidley and Austin. Sidley takes only the best of the best — plus a few affirmative action babies. Michelle has admitted that she couldn’t have made it into Princeton on her own merits. I would bet the mortgage that the same was true for law school. She is no great intellect. That is absolutely apparent. At times she embarrasses even her husband — another affirmative action baby, albeit a smarter one than Michelle.
At Sidley, although she was undoubtedly one of the least capable associates, she was the most demanding. She asked for, and got, plum assignments because everyone was bending over backwards to please the affirmative action hire, and to avoid looking like a bigot. Even then, she wasn’t satisfied.
Being an associate at a big law firm isn’t fun, even for the ones who make it on their merits. They are expected to put in killer hours, usually doing the boring, repetitive stuff that needs to be done, but that partners don’t want to do — like reviewing rooms full of documents. But the normal hires know that they have to pay their dues.
Not our dear Michelle.
There is nothing “distinguished” about that woman. And the only thing remarkable about her is her sense of entitlement.
You know, there hasn’t been a really great evil female for a while. Speaking in terms of recorded history. Yeah, I know about Hillary , but she was never great, more of a minor djin. Michelle has a real chance at greatness. Eva Peron? Good, not great, evil-wise. A woman at a Jezebel level, an Athaliah.
I don’t think she’s evil. I think she is a dolt. A dolt who has been told she is special because she is black. A dolt who resents people who aren’t dolts, and who has bought into racist anti-White philosophies to excuse he own doltishness.
American WHO?
She probably just didn’t want to bother with the continuing ed stuff.
Probably didn’t pay the require fee for renewal.
Well, we don’t know what we don’t know, nor does she know what she will blossom into in the hothouse. We only know she has been prepped and prepping, angling but not wrangling. Wrangling is beneath her.
Then the license would be cancelled, not suspended.
It’s pretty well established that’s how she got to Princeton and Law school; I think she said as much.
In his case, he’s too vain. But no SATs, no LSATs, being president of the law review w/o any signed articles - along with his being so inarticulate off the prompter - it adds up to his being an AA baby, too.
“nor does she know what she will blossom into in the hothouse”
Why does that phrase bring to mind “Little Shop of Horrors?”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.