Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

World Development Report 2009


1 posted on 12/23/2008 3:32:57 AM PST by CE2949BB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: CE2949BB

Boo hoo, oh boo hoo.


2 posted on 12/23/2008 3:43:08 AM PST by Waco (Oath? What oath?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CE2949BB

There is a valid reason why 95% of the people live on 10% of the available land, which of course are the urban areas. By living in the cities they do not have to travel as far to pick up their welfare checks from the gubmint.


3 posted on 12/23/2008 3:43:15 AM PST by 101voodoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CE2949BB

This trend is not surprising considering that even during the ancient times, if you wanted to be successful you had to go to the cities. That’s why places like Athens, Rome, Jeruselem, etc. became vitally important centers of economic and political power back then.


4 posted on 12/23/2008 4:06:39 AM PST by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CE2949BB

so much for the theory of global overpopulation

best regards, blu


6 posted on 12/23/2008 4:56:54 AM PST by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CE2949BB
Obama’s election is proof of this. Look at a map break down of the voting and it's obvious the majority of the country in the outlying areas went Republican but the concentration of “urban” voters in the cities gave the electoral votes to The One.
9 posted on 12/23/2008 5:40:37 AM PST by Taichi (Certe, toto, sentio nos in kansate non iam adesse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson