1 posted on
12/23/2008 3:32:57 AM PST by
CE2949BB
To: CE2949BB
2 posted on
12/23/2008 3:43:08 AM PST by
Waco
(Oath? What oath?)
To: CE2949BB
There is a valid reason why 95% of the people live on 10% of the available land, which of course are the urban areas. By living in the cities they do not have to travel as far to pick up their welfare checks from the gubmint.
3 posted on
12/23/2008 3:43:15 AM PST by
101voodoo
To: CE2949BB
This trend is not surprising considering that even during the ancient times, if you wanted to be successful you had to go to the cities. That’s why places like Athens, Rome, Jeruselem, etc. became vitally important centers of economic and political power back then.
To: CE2949BB
so much for the theory of global overpopulation
best regards, blu
6 posted on
12/23/2008 4:56:54 AM PST by
blueplum
To: CE2949BB
Obama’s election is proof of this. Look at a map break down of the voting and it's obvious the majority of the country in the outlying areas went Republican but the concentration of “urban” voters in the cities gave the electoral votes to The One.
9 posted on
12/23/2008 5:40:37 AM PST by
Taichi
(Certe, toto, sentio nos in kansate non iam adesse)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson