Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Windows needs a Linux package manager
Internet News ^ | December 12th | Michael Kerner

Posted on 12/18/2008 5:54:37 PM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing

Windows users have a real problem when it comes to updates. Sure they have Microsoft Update and certainly many applications include their own update mechanisms. Yet despite that, there seems to be a problem with Windows users actually updating.

So allow me to make a suggestion. Microsoft (or a really smart ISV) should build a full application manager for Windows, similar to what most Linux distributions do today.

For the non-Linux users out there - what Linux distros typically do is have a package management utility of some sort that pulls updates from a package repository (or repositories). Those updates could be for the core operating system but also could include updates for any application package in a repository. So if for example Mozilla Firefox is updated, you don't necessary have to go to Mozilla to update. Instead if its in your Linux distro's repository when an update is issued you'll get an update as part of your existing unified update process.

Small caveat though - there can sometimes be a delay between the time an application has an update upstream and the time an update actually appears in a particular Linux repository.

Overall though, the general idea of one unified approach through a master application package updating tool is one that in my view keeps Linux users (relatively speaking) up to date (and no pun intended on the old Red Hat Up2date command). Wouldn't that type of system be a good one for Windows too? Wouldn't you rather have one update process instead of many?


TOPICS: Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: foss; linux; oss; windows
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: Halfmanhalfamazing; Swordmaker
But then, as always, you could just get a Mac . . . (ducking now).
21 posted on 12/19/2008 5:52:12 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (We already HAVE a fairness doctrine. It's called, "the Constitution." Accept no substitute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

^^^^^^^^^^Yeah, like the average American wants to be a geeky dork that gets off on configuring their computers all day. No thanks. I’d rather be busy configuring my wife’s bra.^^^^^^^^^^

Yeah, being as my linux has a one stop shop to get it all done, I configure that bra a lot more often since going with linux.

:-)


22 posted on 12/19/2008 5:53:14 AM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing (There is no "rich". There is only "the hiring class".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

Apple/mac software could benefit from a repository as well.

See post five, and read it through the lenses of a mac user.

What I wrote isn’t limitted to Windows, it very well applies to the mac experience as well.

If anything, given Apple’s long history of ‘ease of use’ you’d think they would’ve been the first company to come up with the idea of a repository. :-P


23 posted on 12/19/2008 5:56:26 AM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing (There is no "rich". There is only "the hiring class".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Let there be.....ISUSPM. There, all better now.


24 posted on 12/19/2008 5:57:33 AM PST by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing
If anything, given Apple’s long history of ‘ease of use’ you’d think they would’ve been the first company to come up with the idea of a repository.

Linux: repository

Microsoft: suppository

25 posted on 12/19/2008 6:05:05 AM PST by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

Grab the ankles!

ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!


26 posted on 12/19/2008 6:07:55 AM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing (I do not support the federal government's terrorist bailout plan ; Gitmo needs to stay put)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
Yeah, like the average American wants to be a geeky dork that gets off on configuring their computers all day. No thanks. I’d rather be busy configuring my wife’s bra.

Hmm, well that's only slightly creepy...

In any event, a Windows user is obligated to spend much more time configuring their system that a Linux user, and thats just to keep it running.  There's the regular virus scanning, spyware scanning, defragging and Windows Updating including the check by Windows Genuine Advantage to "protect you" from running a pirated Windows.  Then you have to keep the virus and spyware signatures up to date and re-buy if needed, and reinstall a new version of the virus scanner when it expires.  Remember to keep that thing running in the background at all times, them viruses and rootkits are nasty. Then go to the respective web sites of your firewall and other commonly used software to download the updates. Install each of them.  

Whew! It hardly leaves enough time for you to awkwardly tell us how much of a man you are. 

27 posted on 12/19/2008 6:11:32 AM PST by MichiganMan (Look I know you need that big vehicle to...compensate. But dont then whine about the cost to fill it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking
Microsoft: suppository

Oh, behave. ;-)

Amazing << Hear this. Feel this, and tell me that this isn't music.


28 posted on 12/19/2008 6:41:21 AM PST by rdb3 ([T]he cool regions of the head are easily trumped by the raging fires of the heart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MichiganMan

“In any event, a Windows user is obligated to spend much more time configuring their system that a Linux user, and thats just to keep it running. “

Really, I do all that? Didn’t know. My XP box has been running just fine for several years and my servers even longer. No problems. Unlike Linux, I’ve never even had to enter a single single command line.


29 posted on 12/19/2008 6:43:48 AM PST by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MichiganMan

“No thanks. I’d rather be busy configuring my wife’s bra.
Hmm, well that’s only slightly creepy...

Bras are creepy? I can see why you like Linux. lol.


30 posted on 12/19/2008 6:45:17 AM PST by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

No it doesn’t.

The WORST thing about Linux for the average user is the package manager and the repository. 90% of the stuff available is arcane stuff only a Linux geek would know or understand. Honestly, how many regular users are going to install libgalago-gtk-dev? Yet it’s right there among tens of thousands of choices. Too much choice is not good.

Maybe there should be a few modes: user, administrator and developer. Hide most of the stuff for user, show all but dev tools for administrator, and the dev tools for developers. If what a user downloads needs some libraries, install them silently behind the main download. You’ll need a notification like “Support files will be installed with this package” and a non-intrusive button to view a list of the files.


31 posted on 12/19/2008 7:28:29 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion
But then, as always, you could just get a Mac

You get kind of the same thing by installing MacPorts.

32 posted on 12/19/2008 7:37:11 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

I used to use update expert to update Windows servers, not just the O/S updates but any software that you could build a package for. Now Shavlik bought UE and is killing it off for their own crappy product which I’ve heard they actually approved using UE functions so I’ll probably download it to test it.

Now we use MS WUS, I mean WSUS, it seems to work well for MS products but updating say, Adobe, good luck, if anyone knows how to do it, I’d greatly appreciate it. The other option is SMS or whatever they call it this week.


33 posted on 12/19/2008 7:38:48 AM PST by Lx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
I listened to several tracks and they are good. I tend to like cross-genre stuff (Queen and ELO for example). I'll probably download a few tracks.
34 posted on 12/19/2008 7:39:29 AM PST by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Lx

approved=improved, idiot!


35 posted on 12/19/2008 7:42:32 AM PST by Lx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
Unlike Linux, I’ve never even had to enter a single single command line.

You either have a LOT of GUI-overlay tools or don't get too into it. Do you do any networking? Ping, tracert, netstat, ipconfig and nslookup are the best ways to find out what's going on. Some things are just done better though the command line, no matter what OS you're on.

36 posted on 12/19/2008 7:44:15 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
Wireless on a cheap laptop can be a pain with several flavors of Linux.

I recently converted an old Win98 machine to Xubuntu. The Windows WiFi driver was a pain to set up and use. Xubuntu saw the card and just set it up (it may have helped that it had a common chipset).

37 posted on 12/19/2008 7:48:31 AM PST by sionnsar (Iran Azadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY)|http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com/|RCongressIn2Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
Unlike Linux, I’ve never even had to enter a single single command line.

Me neither, in PCLinuxOS.

38 posted on 12/19/2008 8:08:58 AM PST by Big Giant Head (I should change my tagline to "Big Giant penguin on my Head")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
I'm in complete agreement with you.

Linux will never be ready for the masses unless someone comes up with a way to add/update software that is closer to the Windows model. The Linux way scares off way too many average users. For most who would even bother to read a thread like this, the process isn't all that hard. But if Mona in Pamona ever even thought of dumping Winders for Linux she'd run screaming at the first sight of a command line.

39 posted on 12/19/2008 9:28:14 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (A couple of pints and a package of crisps....ahhh. Life's good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

^^^^^^^^^^^^^Unlike Linux, I’ve never even had to enter a single single command line.^^^^^^^^^^^^^

That linux has been dead for a long time.

Commands aren’t required any more for linux than for windows or mac.


40 posted on 12/19/2008 10:45:15 AM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing (I do not support the federal government's terrorist bailout plan ; Gitmo needs to stay put)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson