Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Erin McLean takes Fifth, gets 95 days for contempt
Knoxville News Sentinel ^ | 12/15/8 | Jamie Satterfield

Posted on 12/15/2008 1:02:16 PM PST by SmithL

A Knox County judge today ordered Erin McLean jailed for 95 days for what he contended were 17 acts of contempt - more time behind bars than her husband received in the March 2007 shooting death of her 18-year-old lover.

Fourth Circuit Court Judge Bill Swann imposed a 10-day sentence for each of the violations, stacking one on top of the other for a total of 170 days. He suspended 75 of those days, however.

"Court orders have to be followed," Swann told Erin McLean. "That has to have consequences."

Swann faulted McLean for repeatedly invoking her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination at today's hearing. "Her silence does not help," Swann said.

Swann deemed Erin McLean guilty of keeping her sons away from father Eric McLean despite an order by Swann filed in February giving him equal parenting time.

He also found her guilty of contacting the boys after the judge had ordered both parents in October to have no contact absent approval from a child psychologist and Swann himself.

(Excerpt) Read more at knoxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: erinmclean; mclean
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: mnehrling

The Fifth Amendment only applies in criminal matters.

Divorce is a civil matter.


21 posted on 12/15/2008 1:35:33 PM PST by MeanWestTexan (Beware Obama's Reichstag fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KevinB
The husband told the kid to stay away and the kid sat out front of the house in his car and basically told the husband to go F himself, which then precipitated the demise of said kid. He had it coming.

Dayumn

22 posted on 12/15/2008 1:37:02 PM PST by Centurion2000 (To protect and defend ... against all enemies, foreign and domestic .... by any means necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: KevinB

“She was doing the guy repeatedly in the marital home. The kid absolutely new she was married. The husband told the kid to stay away and the kid sat out front of the house in his car and basically told the husband to go F himself, which then precipitated the demise of said kid. He had it coming.”

In Texas we call that the “he needed killin” defense. Works better than the insanity plea.


23 posted on 12/15/2008 1:37:26 PM PST by MeanWestTexan (Beware Obama's Reichstag fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
The Fifth Amendment only applies in criminal matters.
Divorce is a civil matter.

And self incrimination in a civil case can lead to trial in a criminal case. Still applies if revealing the information would cause self-incrimination unless the judge+DA want to grant blanket immunity. Shouldn't it?

24 posted on 12/15/2008 1:38:54 PM PST by Centurion2000 (To protect and defend ... against all enemies, foreign and domestic .... by any means necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
the judge putting her in jail for citing the Fifth Amendment to the US Constitution is a travesty.

What crime is she charged with, or in danger of being charged with, related to the testimony she refused to give, in a pending child custody/visitation case?

None. The 5th Amendment does not protect you from being forced to give testimony that makes you look stupid, costs you a lot of money, or gets you jailed for contempt of court for violating an order giving your soon to be ex-husband partial custody of your child. There is zero constitutional issue here. You just have a woman who violated a court order, and refused to provide answers about that violation court.

25 posted on 12/15/2008 1:39:07 PM PST by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: SmithL
Two other pics of Erin Mclean:

GUILTY (and apparently, a leper)

NOT GUILTY (Isn't that the chick from DS9 and Becker?)

27 posted on 12/15/2008 1:40:51 PM PST by DemforBush (Millions of conservatives have got your back, Sarah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

The difference is that taking the 5th Amendment is only effective in criminal proceedings and it looks like this was a civil proceeding.

Colonel, USAFR


28 posted on 12/15/2008 1:41:14 PM PST by jagusafr ("Bugs, Mr. Rico! Zillions of 'em!" - Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MahatmaGandu
Drop me a line when the courts have credibility again and I'll care. In the interim, Erin will be in my prayers.

Who do you pray to? This is one wicked lady... you can pray to forgive trespasses against you, but if not against you, one must pray for justice.

You can forgive a debt owed to you, but not one owed to your neighbor. If your friend owes you $100 dollars, you can cancel that debt if you like; however, if your friend owes me $100, you have no such authority to cancel that debt. You can forgive a sin against you, but not a sin against your neighbor. Only God has authority to forgive a murderer and even He will not forgive the unrepentant murderer.

29 posted on 12/15/2008 1:43:11 PM PST by LowOiL (Tagline: Optional, printed after your name on post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

She’s disturbed.


30 posted on 12/15/2008 1:43:16 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

If it is a civil case, she has to answer in most cases. If she objectively thinks she may have some potential criminal liability, she is wise to stay silent without a grant of immunity.


31 posted on 12/15/2008 1:44:00 PM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LowOiL

murderer = sinner in my last post


32 posted on 12/15/2008 1:45:03 PM PST by LowOiL (Tagline: Optional, printed after your name on post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: KevinB
The husband told the kid to stay away and the kid sat out front of the house in his car and basically told the husband to go F himself, which then precipitated the demise of said kid. He had it coming.

If it were my house the word "yourself" wouldn't have made it out of his mouth because my fist would be propelling it into his spleen.

L

33 posted on 12/15/2008 1:45:34 PM PST by Lurker ("America is at that awkward stage. " Claire Wolfe, call your office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

Ping to post 7


34 posted on 12/15/2008 1:47:52 PM PST by SmithL (Drill Dammit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
The Fifth Amendment only applies in criminal matters.

Correct. One can only plead the fifth if the information requested could lead to a criminal prosecution, which would typically not be the case in a divorce or child custody case.

35 posted on 12/15/2008 1:49:07 PM PST by KevinB (John McCain is to the Republican Party as James Taylor is to the the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
In Texas we call that the “he needed killin” defense.

LOL. That's basically what happened. The kid argued that the gun fired accidentally. Under this factual scenario it was a lot easier for the jury to understand how the gun could have "accidentally" been fired.

36 posted on 12/15/2008 1:55:02 PM PST by KevinB (John McCain is to the Republican Party as James Taylor is to the the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate
Shouldn’t you shot your wife instead of the guy?

That's always been my take on it too.

BTW-good tag line, and the answer is NOW.

37 posted on 12/15/2008 1:59:40 PM PST by realdifferent1 (We've tried the soap box, jury box and ballot box. Only one box left and it's time to use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
Why are you praying for her? She was having fun with an 18 year old and cheating on her hubby.

You asked a question and then you answered it.

38 posted on 12/15/2008 2:01:40 PM PST by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: realdifferent1
Shouldn’t you shot your wife instead of the guy?

I think I would much rather be known by my kids as the guy who shot the guy who was screwing their mother rather than as the guy who shot their mother.

39 posted on 12/15/2008 2:03:31 PM PST by KevinB (John McCain is to the Republican Party as James Taylor is to the the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
The Fifth Amendment only applies in criminal matters. Divorce is a civil matter.

"The Fifth Amendment 'can be asserted in any proceeding, civil or criminal, "
http://www.lectlaw.com/def/f083.htm

Not that I'm trying to defend what this woman did (far from it!), but the law is the law.
If she was not held in contempt for repeated 5th Amendment use, what is the contempt charge?

40 posted on 12/15/2008 2:06:41 PM PST by jeffc (They're coming to take me away! Ha-ha, he-he, ho-ho!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson