Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: jackmercer

There’s risk everywhere. Most people’s savings is not going to be threatened by a run on the bank in this day and age and if that is the case, hopefully we will return to sound money where that won’t be a problem.

Is having a retirement program run inefficiently by the federal government any better? So should we just never set aside our own money and expect someone else to do it for us?


29 posted on 12/13/2008 12:01:39 AM PST by djsherin (The federal government:: Because someone has to f*** things up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: djsherin

“So should we just never set aside our own money and expect someone else to do it for us?”

Of course we should set aside some of our own money and have our own investments. I am just advocating for the position of leaving the 7% SS tax in place for the guarantee. All other discretionary income should be at the whim of the earner. Where in any post above did you deduce that I am for all discretionary income to be turned over to government control?


32 posted on 12/13/2008 12:06:25 AM PST by jackmercer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson