[econjack]

They know this, but after the 2000 ruling in the Presidential election, I don't think they want to touch this with a 10’ pole, regardless of its merit.

[SteamShovel]

They know this, but after the 2000 ruling in the Presidential election, I don't think they want to touch this with a 10’ pole, regardless of its merit.

Then they would be cowards deciding to hide from an issue that would be their duty to deal with.

Deriliction of Duty should then be pursued.

This is a burning issue that will not go away on it's own. The SC has a duty to directly deal with it and rule one way or another. Ignoring it is not dealing with it directly. If they do not deal with this and real and credible evidence surfaces in the future, all hell will break loose. The SC can and should prevent this.